Jack Black is the Frigg’n Man.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Skyemaster: Our Custom-Made Jazzmaster for Skye of Fleet Foxes!

Trust me, it's not as complicated as it looks. It is, however, just as cool as it looks, which is a boon.

Isn’t that neat? I was just discussing with my wife the fact that when I first moved to Seattle, I’d have never dreamed that two years later I’d be working on guitars for real-live touring bands, let alone actually building guitars for them! What fun!

Self-congratulatory remarks aside, I really can’t tell you how excited I am to share this one with you. It was a lot of work (which you’ll hear all about in a moment) but I have to say what a rewarding project this was, with Skye–and his mum–being even more pleased than I was. But enough talk! Allons-y!

This project only came about a short time ago. We’re talking just months ago, when Skye first approached us about doing a little something special for him. His aim was to have a guitar built specifically for his forthcoming solo project, with a few custom touches that would make for a really interesting guitar. In his mind, this guitar was to be “the crux of the record.” The word “crux” was thrown around a lot, admittedly in jest by the end. It’s almost a meme ’round these parts. God forbid a fast-food run come back missing something. “Pickles are the CRUX of this burger!” or “Barry Gibb was the CRUX of the Bee Gees!” and “Pretty girls are the CRUX of my innermost personal torment!” you might imagine us yelling, feigning sincerity.

Here’s a quick rundown of the features, followed by a typically loquacious blog post about the guitar:

  •  A vintage Jazzmaster neck (1963) with a new set of TonePros Kluson tuners
  • A vintage (’63) Jazzmaster vibrato unit
  • AllParts body
  • A gold anodized aluminum guard
  • A Jaguar 3 switch control plate for switching
  • 2 Lollar Jazzmaster Pickups
  • A vintage (and very HOT) DeArmond Gold Foil pickup in the middle position
  • A Curtis Novak Lipstick pickup in the “behind-the-bridge” position for super-cool ghost tones and endless fun
  • Mastery Bridge
  • 500k pots for both sets of lead and rhythm circuit controls to tame the high end
  • A crazy-ass pickup selection scheme (it’s not that crazy)
  • VERY special roughly-polished brass thumb wheels that match the pickguard

Even though months sounds like plenty of time, when you’re waiting for correspondence, trying to plan a build whilst going back and forth on specs from across the country–Leading Tone in Seattle, Skye living in New York–things can take a lot longer than one might expect. At first, this build was supposed to be partially completed by the immensely talented Joe Riggio, whose F-style creations are as beautiful to behold as they are to play. We had already been working closely with Joe, talking about body shapes and contours, as well as setting up precision CNC routing for those special, Skye-approved touches.

Unfortunately, because of Skye’s impending studio dates, there just wasn’t time to have the right body cut and finished. Instead, an AllParts Jazzmaster body was ordered and shipped to us right away. In the mean time, I decided to have the neck ready.

That's the happiest decal Fender ever made.

For the neck, Skye opted for something he knew he would love: a genuine 1963 Fender Jazzmaster neck he scored on Ebay, which is very similar in profile to the neck on the white ’63 Jazzmaster he uses with the Foxes. The finish on the back of the neck was in that just-worn phase, with the slick feel of nearly-bare wood greeting the thumb like an old friend dropping by for tea. And can I say that the 7.25″ radius just feels magical?

Only a few lines' worth of fret! Oh noes!

As I expected, the neck was in need of a level and crown at the very least. In reality, there was far too little fret left for my files to even begin crowning, so a full refret was the only choice here. Then there was the bad news: the fretboard hadn’t exactly been taken care of, and had become so brittle that even very light fretwork meant flaking in the extreme. I tried to pre-treat the board with some lemon oil in hopes that the rosewood’s new found moistness would convince it to play fair, but to no avail. That board was intent on making my work way harder. “Whatever. Bring it.” I chided. Yes, I talk to myself.

And so I set about the great and arduous task of removing these frets without absolutely wrecking the fretboard. To test the waters, I utilized the normal soldering iron technique, wherein I heat the fret before pulling it out, minimizing chipping while liquifying any glue that may have been used. Some frets were easily liberated from the fretboard without too much fuss, but with more than a few frets threatening to tear wood away from their slots, I had to try taking them out the same way they might have gone in. It may be no surprise to you that Fender used to actually slide the frets in rather than the usual press-in method, using the sharpened tang of the fret to cut through its channel enabling it to seat properly and stably without glue. With the aid of my fretting hammer and one of my smaller files, I was able to [more] easily extract the aforementioned problem frets. Even so, that fretboard did not have the integrity to avoid some major chipping.

One has to look closely to see any of the patches!

Armed with super glue and my bag full of rosewood dust I’d collected from previous jobs, I started filling in the missing bits, taking care to slip a piece of Teflon in the fret slots to keep glue out. Once the “new wood” set, I used files to trim it flush with the existing rosewood, then sanded to a smooth finish. Sadly, each time I thought I was finished, more wood decided to flake away. In all I had to repeat this process three times, but I’m really happy with the end result. To my dismay, I neglected to take photos of this part of the process as time was at a premium. I do, however, have a photo of the finished board for you.

This fret job also required some patient work, but not because of any major problems; the extra care I took was due to my own nerves getting the better of me. Because this guitar was being made for Skye, I had the sneaking suspicion that it would eventually be seen by one of my personal guitar repair and tech heroes, luthier John Woodland. If the name sounds familiar, he’s the designer of the oft-lauded (and life-affirming) Mastery Bridge, an aftermarket replacement for the stock unit on Fender offset guitars. He also is the first-call repairman for the likes of Nels Cline, whom you may know from my numerous, nearly incoherent ramblings on the subject of best guitarists ever. And Wilco. Also the Nels Cline Singers. He’s also done work for Skye in the past, and Skye later confirmed that this guitar will probably make its way to him someday. So, you get my gist? I’m saying I was frigg’n nervous.

As for the fret job, there’s really not much to tell. It actually went quite smoothly. Go figure. Once the StewMac #148 frets were perfectly level and crowned, and with ends invisible to the hand, I moved on to the body. Oh, the body.

Half futuristic raygun, half Victorian brass automaton.

This is where things got really tricky. Being that the body was from AllParts it’s no secret that they’re made to fit MIJ parts. This meant that there would be some required modification for proper fitting of the various parts we’d chosen for the project. For instance, the vintage, American-made neck wouldn’t quite fit the pocket, so I armed myself with a few files and went to work. Other necessary routing and drilling to the body included widening the tremolo cavity by a fraction of an inch to accommodate the vintage ’63 unit, the rhythm circuit cavity was too shallow for the wheels to turn freely, bridge thimbles had to be drilled and the lipstick behind the bridge had to have a special route added to the body. Luckily, John provided a kickass hand router with an ingenious depth stopper thing, so without wanting to show you pictures I can confirm that it looks fabulous.

I'm super excited about those brass wheels!

That was a lot of work. Luckily, wiring and assembly was far less vexing, with a fairly straightforward pickup selection scheme. The Jaguar control plate currently controls the three main pickups, with a simple on/off switch for each pickup. We’ve done away with the traditional rhythm circuit, replacing it with dedicated controls for the lipstick. This might change, as neither Skye or myself really knew what would work best at the time. We may move the lipstick to the last on/off switch on the Jag plate, leaving the upper-horn controls to govern the tone and volume of the Gold Foil, which might actually work a lot better as far as blending options go.

Once the guitar was together I really started digging this offset oddity. I wasn’t totally sold on the unfinished appearance of the body at first, but with everything in its right place I have to say that I’m partial to the D.I.Y. aesthetic of the piece as a whole. All of the colors at play on this guitar seem to blend well together; the three separate wood tones contrast nicely with the mix of gold, brass and chrome reminiscent of an old grandfather clock or a pocket watch. Now that I think of it, if you’ve ever seen the meant-to-be-sweet-but-is-creepy-as-hell kids movie Return To Oz, (Disney’s amazingly bleak sequel to the well-loved and far less jarring Wizard of Oz) you might even be reminded of Tik-Tok and Princess Mombi’s palace. I know I am. *shudders* *head rolls off*

Skye's guitar is this picture.

And, while I’m talking about the metal on this guitar, may I draw your attention to the brass thumb wheels! I’m really, really proud of them, but the look came about completely by accident. I had to enlarge the post holes of those wheels because they wouldn’t fit on what were supposed to be the correct pots. While drilling them out (which, let’s face it, is not a good idea) a wandering drill bit worked away at the black finish on these parts, exposing the shiny yellow metal hidden within. Coworker and BFF for life Mike Ball had the brilliant notion to machine away the black leaving behind only smooth brass with plenty of tooling marks in tact. I think the effect is quite alluring!

The stars of this show really are the DeArmond Gold Foil in the middle position and the lipstick in the far back position. If you aren’t familiar with them, Gold Foils are exceptionally loud, balanced pickups usually found on bargain brands from the ’60s. While the guitars have a sort of “love ‘em or hate ‘em” reception in the guitar world, the pickups are undeniably fun to play. I can’t remember what this particular one measured, but it’s loud for sure. Loud enough that it’s just slightly out-of-balance with the Lollar JM pickups that surround it, but not in a bad way. Gritty, thick and meaty. It’s really fun to engage this pickup in combination with either Lollar as you would engage a boost pedal or a third channel.

The Novak lipstick is absolutely the most fun aspect of the guitar; Jazzmasters already exhibit the quirky-but-cool overtones of the excess string that lives at the tailpiece, but with a dedicated pickup wired in series these tones take on a life of their own. A sort of cool, ghost-like chorus effect happens with the lipstick and one of the other three pickups engaged, where you can barely distinguish the jangly, “what’s that sound?!” nature back there.

My favorite trick, though, is turning off the main pickups and engaging the lipstick, bumping up the gain and strumming hard in the normal position. This causes a buzzy, droning effect with plenty of character while the normal chords poke through the cacophony. This alone makes me want to hack up my Sonic Blue so I can have fun too.

Any excuse to post this photo is good enough for me.

At the end of all of this, Skye seemed blown away by this guitar, and even his mother, whom he brought with him, was thrilled about it. As Skye’s fingers danced on the fretboard, going from free jazz to noise in an instant’s notice, those of us in the store were mesmerized by something completely new and completely unique. “That sounds beautiful!” his mother exclaimed repeatedly.

And it did. We were fully prepared to show you the super-cool demo video we recorded in celebration of this amazing guitar, but alas, it was deleted purely by accident and not because I played terribly. Not at all. Maybe Skye will be kind enough to let us borrow it again…

The whole gang! (minus BFF Ball)

UPDATE: BIG, BIG thanks goes out to the great folks at Mastery Bridge for drawing attention to this build. I’m honored that Skye trusts me enough to let me have at it, but I never expected the good vibes to spill over like this.

If you’re coming here from the Offset forums, cheers! It’s good to have you!

Posted in Guitar Repair, Jazzmaster/Jaguar Tips and Tricks, Things That Excite Us | Leave a comment

Strymon TimeLine and Blue Sky Reverb available

I have 5 of each. They will not last long so contact us if you want one.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Converting to Baritone? Read This!

This week a customer came in wanting to have his Telecaster set up for baritone strings and tuned to A. He had bought a few sets of D’addario strings for baritone guitar .and was hoping all it needed was a restring. Unfortunately, things aren’t quite that simple and I’ve been mulling over our conversation ever since.

I felt bad about our initial conversation; I hate being the bearer of bad news, and when a job isn’t as cut-and-dry as the customer thinks, I often feel regret that things aren’t so straightforward. Ultimately he chose not to go through the process, saying he might try just throwing the strings on himself. I didn’t intend to discourage him from having fun, but I thought it important to let him know the ins and outs of doing this change properly. So, what gives?

He then added, "Why so serious?"

Well, there are a few things to consider when experimenting with the baritone alternative lifestyle (not that there’s anything wrong with that):

The Fender Bass VI

First, when we say baritone there might be a couple of different definitions at play. To my mind, the word immediately conjures the sound, look and feel of old Fender and Danelectro guitars, such as the Danelectro Longhorn and U2 models and the venerable Fender Bass VI. These instruments were proper baritones, yielding an extended scale length (27″ to 30″ are most frequently seen) and much thicker strings. Both of the aforementioned instruments were ubiquitous within the realms of Country, Surf and Spaghetti Western themes, enjoying a spate of renewed interest in the 80s and 90s thanks to fuzzed-out Shoegaze bands and Surf revivalists.

Danelectro U2 Baritone

In more modern terms, a Baritone guitar might also refer to down-tuned metal guitars, either made with heavier strings in mind or offering a longer scale and hot pickups. 7- or 8-string guitars also fall under this category, and companies such as Ibanez, Gibson, ESP and PRS have made models like this finding success in the newer Metal market. It seems as though some bands are taking the challenge seriously, finding out just how many strings they can put on a guitar and how low they can tune them.

Why does this matter?

Obviously, these guitars have vastly different tones, and chances are if you’re looking for a spanky, slinky tic-tac tone to fill in the gaps on your next drenched-in-verb Surf tune you’ll not find what you’re looking for with an Ibanez Marten Hagstrom 8-string. Vice versa, Metal players might not appreciate the jangly voice of Danelectro lipstick pickups as their main sound, especially at high, feedback-inducing volumes. To be frank, it’s your purpose that dictates the kind of instrument or strings you’ll choose, and your tonal end goal has a lot to do with which route you take.

Ibanez Marten Hagstrom 8 string guitar

As for the second point of interest, you may want to ask yourself, “What tuning will I use?”  If you’re going down to D or C standard (D isn’t technically a baritone tuning, but it is lower than standard so I think this applies) there may not be too much of a difference in terms of set up on an standard-scale instrument. For instance, I’ve had great success tuning my Les Paul Standard down to C standard for chunky riffage with nary a tweak of the truss rod. If you’re going as low as B, A or even E, you may need to think about not only a thicker gauge of string, which I’d say is necessary for retaining a similar feel at such tunings, but a longer neck as well. Such low tunings require an extended scale length for proper intonation, fret placement, and to accommodate the added girth and tension of  baritone guitar strings. If you stick with a standard scale length, you’re going to have to drastically change the set up of your guitar.

In the above customer service story, the strings he chose were D’addario Baritone strings gauged 013-.062″, meant for a scale length of 29 3/4″. Trouble is, standard scale for a Telecaster is 25 1/2″ and the guitar was set up for the .010-.046″. That’s a big difference, and not easily overcome without some modification. This means that, had we used those strings, the nut would need to have its slots widened for the strings to seat properly. Of course action and neck relief would have been addressed, but there was little chance that the guitar would even play in tune with such low notes on slackened strings. Honestly, I couldn’t see the point in charging for a job I wasn’t convinced would work out.

I talked to him about different strings but altering the nut was the sticking point. One can easily cut deeper or wider slots in a nut, but it’s not as easy (or cheap) to cut a brand new one. If you’re looking to go back and forth between baritone and standard tuning, why not spend a modest sum on a second guitar? Of course, not everyone has cash to drop on guitars right now, but the going prices on Craigslist Seattle for low-end baritone guitars is between $150-$400. For a player looking to not do a lot of damage to a favorite axe, that’s a paltry sum! Plus, it’s never hard to move a bari; guitarists are always looking for a cool new tone, and once you play some root-position chords at A standard, it’s hard not to throw down money on the spot!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

The Coolest Amplifier I’ve Ever Seen in My Life. Period.

Holy crap, you guys. I wish I could have gotten in on this! In my opinion, the grille cloth replacement actually enhances the look of this amp, lending a Lucas-approved tone to the already spacey vibe of this old Supro.

"Hokey religions and ancient amplifiers are no match for a good blaster by your side, kid." -Han Solo

Yub Yub!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

1964 Gibson ES-335 Appraisal

Happy new year! Tired of hearing that yet? Not us. Here at Leading Tone, we’re all about milking the holidays for as long as we can.

Even with the aftermarket stoptail and chrome appointments, she's a beaut.

Just before Decemberween hit, I was asked to do an appraisal on what I was told was a ’62 ES-335. The serial number checked out for a ’62, but from the moment the case opened I knew it wasn’t a ’62. How did I know? Well, that’s the point of this article.

When doing an appraisal, I spend a great deal of my time taking notes on the instrument, examining components and noting features that seem inconsistent for the suggested year of production. I then take those findings and compare them with specs from the era, taking into account the changes that happened from month to month- especially with Gibson. For instance, Gibson felt no hesitation to use parts as they were available, meaning that you’ll find a few 335′s with nickel hardware well into the late 60′s even though chrome officially replaced nickel by ’66.

How, then, does one truly know the provenance of an instrument? In a case like this, it all boils down to looking not at one specific year and fitting the guitar’s specs into that mold, but rather looking at the range of years specific specs or parts were in production and narrowing it down from there. Think of it like a game of 20 questions; you start knowing nothing at all, and as you ask questions your focus narrows until you zero in on the final answer. It’s like CSI, but without Gil Grissom going on about bugs or how blood reacts to fine leather and fear. This is how we do it here at Leading Tone.

Call 'em horns, call 'em ears, call 'em what you will, but these bad boys are the reason for my skepticism. I love them.

Can you guess how I knew the guitar in question wasn’t a ’62? I’ll let you in on a little secret: Ears. Ears? Ears. Over the years, Gibson continued tweaking the look of the upper and lower horns (or “ears”) on 335s, and as such some years or groups of years show differences in the curve and shape of the ears. Here’s a handy chart I lifted from ES-335.org, which is THE source for information on ES models:

Can you see the difference? Now, see if you can pick out the ’64. Stumped? It’s letter C. Let’s look at each:

A) The ’58 “almost Mickey” ear, not quite as full as B.
B) The classic ’59-’63 “Mickey Mouse Ear”, considered the most appealing style and is        highly coveted. Pay attention to the line inside towards the neck.
C) ’64-’67 sharper horn, marking a drastic difference in look from the previous years. This shape is my preference.
D) Ears became more rounded in ’68
E) ’69-mid 70s
F) Late 70′s sharp horn.

Also worth noting is the waistline of these guitars, getting lazier and expanding as the years passed. There’s a joke to be made about American obesity, but I’m far too comfortable in this leather chair to bothered with it.

Ears are one telltale sign, but there are plenty others:

1) In ’63, the center block of the body received an additional cut-out to facilitate the installation of the wiring harness. Prior to ’63, the block was entirely solid and the pickup cavity looked like what you’d see on a Les Paul.

Detail of that '63 bridge pickup cutout for the electronics.

2) The orange interior label inside the bass-side f hole that tells us the model and serial number of the guitar has “Union Made” printed next to the info. This appeared in ’64. Regretfully, I neglected to obtain a detail shot of this one!

3) Tuners are of the Kluson Deluxe make, with “single line, double ring” configuration. This refers to the line of text stamped into the middle of the tuner enclosure and the two rings around the tuning key itself. These features only appeared between the years of 1960-1964.

Kluson "single-line, double-ring" tuners in all their stable, smooth glory.

4) The pickups on this guitar are of the nickel covered “Patent Number” variety which replaced the earlier “Patent Applied For” (P.A.F.) between the years of 1962 and 1965. After ’65, these pickups were chrome covered.

"Patent Number" pickups that will make you feel alive. Neck...

...and bridge with sticker intact.

5) The “Custom Made” plaque installed behind the bridge was discontinued in ’65 when more of these models came factory-equipped with either a “Trapeze” tailpiece or a Bigsby Vibrato.

6) Block inlays appeared mid-’62.

Sexy block inlays.

7) The nickel Gibson bridge (chrome mid ’65) has the telltale retainer wire (’58-75) and “GIBSON ABR-1″ with corresponding foundry mark (’58-late ’64) and nylon saddles, which appeared in ’63.

Again, I neglected to get a good picture of that foundary mark, but do look it up on ES-335.org. That guy is the man.

Other smaller, but no less significant, details include the position of the “crown” or “flower pot” inlay, which moved frequently throughout the model’s history. This one is just above the A and B string tuners, so we can infer that it’s a pre-’67 model.

Also, the neck has what’s known as a “tenon”, which is the length of wood that preferably extends past the neck on a set neck guitar. This tenon extends well into the neck position pickup rout, which ended around 1970.

Some parts can be changed out, but if they’re original they can also be used to narrow down the year of a particular instrument. For instance, the four-ply pickguard is of the short variety (it ends before the ABR bridge) and has a wide bevel. The long guard was available until ’61, and after ’65 the short guard was given a narrow bevel. The truss rod cover exhibits the same change.

Also telling is the Gibson logo itself. It’s in the open ‘b’, open ‘o’ style that we see from the years of 1958-69. The Gibson logo changed a lot after that, from the letters closing and opening, the ‘s’ becoming quite lazy, and loosing the dot of the ‘i’ entirely. If you see a guitar that’s purported to be a ’60s instrument but is sans dot, beware.

After returning this guitar to its store-bought glory and writing up a report, I spent some much-needed alone time with it, and I can’t tell you how much I fell in love with this guitar. Sweet, singing neck pickup tones gave way to an unparallelled vocal presence in the middle position. The bridge was all-out, gloriously full pushed-mids thrill, and brought a tear to my eyes. Did I mention the neck on this thing? Wonderfully worn in by the same hand all of its life, this neck was smooth and fast, and not at all chunky or too thin. Really something, this one. I was sad to see it go.

If you’re interested in having your guitar appraised by Leading Tone, let us know! We’ll take on any project and treat your instrument as we would our own. Appraisals are $75, including a painstakingly researched evaluation of your instrument written up and printed on official-looking paper. We sign and date the document and stand behind not only its correctness, but also its viability for those using it for insurance purposes.

Don't care how, I want it NOW!

Bring your guitar in today!

Posted in Guitar Repair, Things That Excite Us | Leave a comment

Jazzmaster/Jaguar Tips Part 2!

Lifted from a Wikipedia. I'm so ashamed!

Today’s update is a long-overdue continuation on the theme of set-up tips for Fender’s venerable offset guitars: the Jazzmaster and Jaguar. These two instruments are both highly esteemed and greatly misunderstood in the guitar world, and my hope is to shed some light on the care and feeding of these amazing instruments.

Part of the charm of these models resides behind the bridge; with plenty of string length, picking behind the bridge not only makes some pretty cool overtones, but with vigorous pick  one can sustain notes indefinitely, provided you’re using at least a healthy bit of fuzz or distortion. Add to this the absolutely fluid motion of this highly-underrated vibrato system, and the Jazzmaster and Jaguar become the instruments of choice for those that like to color outside the lines. If you love tone and noise, you owe it to yourself to experience these guitars.

Still, that’s not to say they’re without their quirks, and right now two of them are actually staring you in the face. What I’m talking about are the two large screws that sit just under both E strings. Why are they a problem? Well, for those of us that like to pick behind the bridge, the screws are big enough to touch the bottom of those strings, causing them to be “out of tune”, so to speak. And, because that end of the string is wound, they can also cause tuning problems with wang bar thrills.

But the real problem here is that the Phillips head of the screw is sharp enough to cut through the high E. Many times I’ve had strings simply unravel during performances, and it’s all because of that little screw. Strangely enough, this generally affects reissue guitars more than vintage examples, as the string anchor was much taller. (Q: Why is it that when a company “reissues” something it’s nothing like the original. I know, parts run out and some redesigns are necessary. Come on! A fraction of an inch taller would have done the trick!) What to do? Well, there are options…

First, one could visit the local hardware store in search of a screw with a smaller head, but because of the boggling number of differently-sized screws out there (not to mention this disorder I have called “can’t be bothered” that affects as many as who cares how many people all over the world) this isn’t a recommended use (read: waste) of time.

Secondly, you could try grinding down the screw, which could work save for two obvious caveats: 1) the screw might be accidentally ground far too low, rendering it useless or 2) the screw is ground low enough, but you’ve just spend a huge amount of time on what should be an easy enough fix. For a tech pulling down an hourly wage that’s rumored to be a king’s ransom, usually the most attractive option is also the quickest. This keeps the boss happy, and frees up time for other projects. If you have an afternoon, be my guest.

Or, you could remember the age-old adage: “Flip it over.”

Now, this is a Japanese Jazzmaster, mind you, but the principle works the same for US or foreign models alike.

Yep, it’s that simple, and I say/live this out all the time. Imagine, for instance, a set of dreafully worn Tele saddles. Yes, they look awesome, but what if the owner wants a shiny new set? Flip them over. Depending on the model of saddle, many barrels can be turned over and voilà! Right before your eyes, a magically shiny set of saddles appears! Same goes for ABR bridge thumbwheels. Flip ‘em over, and they’re good as new. This also works for Jazzmaster and Mustang saddles as well.

In this case, the adage applies only to functionality, not aesthetics. When turned upside-down, the screw stays tight and allows the string enough space to run unimpeded from the tailpiece to the bridge. No tuning issues, no out-of-tune notes, no string breakage. At least, none from the screw!

Take 'em out and flip 'em over.

This mod is easy enough that anyone with a screwdriver and a memory can perform it in no time. Remove the tailpiece from its rout, and remember where everything goes. I can’t stress that last point enough: REMEMBER WHERE EVERYTHING GOES! Next, you’ll want to start unscrewing the two outside screws from the row of three in front of the string anchor. Don’t touch the middle one. It doesn’t need to go anywhere.

Moving on to the underside of the plate, screw those two Phillips heads in, and you’ll be ready to reassemble everything. Don’t worry about clearance for the anchor plate; these screws won’t get in the way at all.

Easy. Just remember where everything goes and you'll be fine!

Slide the anchor plate back into its slot, reinstall the spring mechanism and marvel at the wonder of your new, fully string-safe tailpiece that YOU MADE ALL BY YOURSELF! You did it, buddy! I’d give you a blue ribbon, but I’m fresh out! This sounds sarcastic, but I go through the chest-expanding elementary school award ceremony feeling every time I work on a guitar. Seriously, I love this job!

Almost done...

Reinstall the vibrato unit, restring, and enjoy the peace of mind that comes from knowing your strings won’t break because of some stupid, over sized screw in the way.

That should be more than enough clearance.

Ah, Jazzmasters and Jaguars. Is there anything cooler?

 

Posted in Guitar Repair, Jazzmaster/Jaguar Tips and Tricks | Leave a comment

Fender Announces Johnny Marr Signature Jaguar!

With some non-standard (read: frustration minimizing) changes and killer tone, it’s safe to say this one will be a huge hit! I don’t know about you, but I’m interested…

From Fender.com:

“The Johnny Marr signature Jaguar is a fantastically non-standard version of the model that is as distinctive as the sounds Marr wrings from it, with a wealth of highly specialized features including:

  • Custom-wound Bare Knuckle® Johnny Marr single-coil neck and bridge pickups.
  • Custom-shaped maple neck based on Marr’s 1965 Jaguar, with vintage-style truss rod, lacquer finish and Marr’s signature on the front of the headstock.
  • Four-position blade-style pickup switch mounted to the lower-horn chrome plate (bridge, bridge and neck in parallel, neck, bridge and neck in series).
  • Two upper-horn slide switches (universal bright and pickup switch position four bright).
  • Jaguar bridge with Mustang® saddles, nylon bridge post inserts for improved stability, chrome cover and vintage-style floating tremolo tailpiece.
  • Tremolo arm nylon sleeve insert to prevent arm swing.

The guitar comes in Olympic White and new Metallic KO (a distinctive orange tint derived from the heavily faded Candy Apple Red finish of one of Marr’s favorite ’60s-era Fender models).”

That faded CAR sounds amazing, but the standard white finish is elegant. As for the other features, I approve; one of the first things I did when I bought a Jazzmaster was torque down the trem arm, so I’m excited that Fender finally fixed the arm play issue. A thicker neck is also welcome on this model, and I’m really interested to play those Bareknuckle pickups!

Awesome. Let’s all keep our eyes peeled!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Gretsch Tennesseean With a Collapsed Jack!

Isn't she a rose?! I want one. Now.

Late last week, a customer brought us his cherished Gretsch Tennessee Rose, asking for a set up and a repair of an all-too-common ailment. The story goes like this: the owner let his friend borrow this guitar only to watch in horror as, during a performance, his guitar fell from a poorly-secured strap and crashed to the ground. This resulted in a gaping, gnarled hole in the body where the input jack once was. This friend then blamed the fall on the owner, saying “You need to get strap locks!”, and didn’t even offer to help pay for the repair. Some friend, eh?

In any case, this body damage looked really, really bad; immediately I could tell that, no matter what kind of woodworking magic I performed, there was no way to save the wood surrounding the input jack. Not simply cracked and caved in, the wood laminate had also splintered as far as 2 inches away from the hole, making for an extremely unstable location for such an oft-utilized component. Lucky enough, the electronics were in perfect working order, so the challenge here would be purely structural in nature.

When the guitar came to me, I suggested adding a plate of some sort to the lower bout of the guitar. This suggestion was met with wide-eyed excitement, as this was evidently the very thing on the customers mind. The problem with this solution was finding a plate big enough to cover all of the damage. Having spent some time looking for large or oversize jack plates, I knew it would be difficult to track down something that would adequately cover it all up. Additionally, the owner expressed interest in having the finish more or less intact, and as it stood the finish was cracked and lifting for some distance away from the damage. I told him I’d do my best with it, and that I’d try to prevent any more finish from lifting as I took on the task of bringing some much-needed stability into this guitar’s life.

A post-Dremel shot of the damage. The pre- was far too grisly to photograph...

The first thing I did after I determined that the damaged wood wasn’t salvageable was to get out my trusty Dremel and start cutting. This wasn’t difficult, but certainly required a steady touch to avoid further chipping and damage to the good wood. Since we would be adding a jack plate, I made sure to cut a hole large enough for the jack itself to fit through. Again, not difficult.

Then came the jack plate. I mentioned earlier doing some jack plate searches on the web, and in looking at the plates I could find, it was all too obvious that anything standard wasn’t going to do the trick: Les Paul plates were far too small to cover any of the damage let alone the hole I’d cut, Danelectro plates were closer but much too thin to be of use, and all of the other custom plates I’d found were highly stylized or just plain dumb-looking. I mean, it’s a jack plate; no one can see how badass that ghost-flamed, trucker-girl’d accessory is when you’re playing. Ugh.

But seriously, what to do? I mean, honestly, look at that! The hole itself isn’t so big, but the finish that’s been removed is going to be hard to cover without fabricating a custom plate, something that we aren’t exactly equipped to do at whim. the fact of the matter is, I spent nearly an hour googling and brainstorming, looking at not only guitar parts resources but also at domicile depots and cracker-jack hardware suppliers, all to no avail. “This is going to be harder than I thought,” I… thought.

Progress!

Just then, in a flash of divine inspiration, an idea settled upon my mind as a dove! A stroke of genius! I realized, “Michael, you’re going about this in the wrong way. You shouldn’t be looking for a jack plate, you should be looking for a neck plate.”

Whoa. I felt as though I’d learned kung-fu in a moment’s passing, as if the universe and everything in it coalesced in my minds’ eye, and it all made perfect sense- and simultaneously- none at all. I had reached a sort of techy Nirvana, and in that glorious passing of time I knew my path.

A few months back we’d purchased a guitar that seemed to be made from one of those cheap kits you can buy online. It was only half-finished, and the jury was still out on whether or not we’d get it in shape or simply part it out. Well, this guitar had a neck plate and I set about removing the neck in order to test fit it.

A perfect fit!

In holding the plate to the body, the fit was uncanny; not only would the plate fit the body perfectly but it would also cover up most of the damage! Score! The only things that needed to be done to the neck plate to make it a perfect fit were bending it to fit the curvature of the body and drilling a hole for the jack. The former was addressed with a soft dead-blow hammer and my nut vice, the latter easily accomplished with careful measurement and the step-bit we use for drilling out pedal enclosures.

After drilling the four pilot holes for the shortened screws we picked up, installation was a breeze and the final result looked amazing. Not only does the plate fit in with the overall aesthetic of the guitar, but it looks serious. I told John, “That jack isn’t going anywhere. If it does, it’ll be the rest of the guitar that breaks and not that plate!”

I’m really thrilled with how this project turned out, and I’m told the owner of the guitar was pleased as well. Success!

Not only was the fit perfect, but it looked right with all of the other hardware!

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

When Relics Go Bad!

So, I stole that title from the Guitarz Blog, which if you’re unfamiliar it’s one of the greatest sites devoted to guitars on the web. Do take a moment to check it out, and come on back. We’ll wait.

***

Pretty rad, huh? Not only a great site, but great guys as well. I’ve commented on their posts with comments back from them in no time. Extremely informative and highly trustworthy especially on the subject of off-brand or copy instruments.

This post, however, revolves around a pet peeve of mine: homemade relic guitars. I tend to surf eBay and Craigslist in search of cool guitars at decent prices. Sometimes there’s a deal, but more often than not there’s a great instrument at an insanely high price with the seller having come across some downright bad information. You’ll see things posted at a “discount” from the MSRP, “improved” guitars and guitars like this “relic”.

But wha... I... they... the thi-... and... NOOOOOOOOOOO!

This guitar was, at one time, a Gibson ES-335. The model hasn’t changed of course, but my goodness! That finish! What happened?!

This sort of thing just depresses me. I see this guitar, and like an abused puppy, my heart goes out to it. I want to take it home and dress its wounds, care for it, and nurse it back to health. Then I want to play with it, as is natural for both dogs and guitars. Also, they both bark, wail, cry and howl. Enough with the dog/guitar comparisons.

Anyway, my heart breaks over these photos, and I can’t imagine paying that much for a guitar so distressed. Also, take a look at what the seller calls a “transition” between the finishes. Note the “Custom Shop” truss-rod cover and ruined headstock veneer.

It's less of a transition and more of a steep decline.

Now, who wants to buy me a big Christmas gift so’s we can intervene in the life of this lost soul?!

“There’s a fine line between clever and stupid.” -David St. Hubbins

Posted in When Relics Go Bad | Leave a comment